Godhra train fire: SC refuses to stay Nanavati report
26 Sep 2008, 1334 hrs IST,PTI
:
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to stay the circulation of Justice G T Nanavati report relating to the Godhra carnage in Gujarat. ( Watch )
A petition seeking a stay on the report was mentioned before a Bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan which posted its hearing for October 13.
The NGO, Citizen for Justice and Peace, approached the apex court contending that a report by Justice U C Banerjee Committee on the same carnage has been stayed and a similar step should be taken for the Justice Nanavati Commission report which was tabled in the Gujarat assembly on Wednesday.
More
Friday, September 26, 2008
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
35 Sitting Judges to be questioned by CBI for Fraud
24 Sep 2008, 0347 hrs IST, Dhananjay Mahapatra,TNN |
NEW DELHI: A "willing" CBI was tasked on Monday by the Supreme Court to pinpoint the "black sheep" from among 35 sitting judges — one in SC, 11 in HCs and 23 in district courts — suspected to have played a role in the fraudulent withdrawal of Rs 23 crore from the provident fund accounts of class IV court employees in the Ghaziabad judiciary. The urgency to weed out the corrupt from judiciary was evident from the detailed order passed by a Bench comprising Justices Arijit Pasayat, V S Sirpurkar and G S Singhvi, which set a three-month deadline for CBI to file its first status report on the investigation not only into the scam but also all dealings relating to it. |
Labels:
court,
impeachment of judges,
PF Sacm,
Supreme Court
Monday, September 22, 2008
Jamia Milia Islamia to take care of the arrested students
Indian Express > Delhi >
Jamia to provide legal help to two arrested students
Hamari Jamatia
Posted: Sep 23, 2008 at 0913 hrs IST
New Delhi, September 22 In an unexpected turn of events, Jamia Milia Islamia on Monday evening decided to provide legal help to its two students arrested for alleged connection in Saturday’s serial blasts across the Capital.
Mohammad Shakeel, a second-year MA student, and Zia-Ur-Rehman (third year BA) were arrested on Sunday.
Jamia Vice-Chancellor Mushirul Hasan told Newsline in the evening that he would take steps to look into the “well being” of his students.
Jamia’s media coordinator Rakhshanda Jalil told Newsline, “The university has now decided to provide legal help to the two students caught on Sunday.” Since the two are students of Jamia, “the university feels it is a responsibility to safeguard them until they are proven guilty.”: Sep 23, 2008 at 0913 hrs IST
New Delhi, September 22 In an unexpected turn of events, Jamia Milia Islamia on Monday evening decided to provide legal help to its two students arrested for alleged connection in Saturday’s serial blasts across the Capital.
Mohammad Shakeel, a second-year MA student, and Zia-Ur-Rehman (third year BA) were arrested on Sunday.
Jamia Vice-Chancellor Mushirul Hasan told Newsline in the evening that he would take steps to look into the “well being” of his students.
Jamia’s media coordinator Rakhshanda Jalil told Newsline, “The university has now decided to provide legal help to the two students caught on Sunday.” Since the two are students of Jamia, “the university feels it is a responsibility to safeguard them until they are proven guilty.”
Link
Jamia to provide legal help to two arrested students
Hamari Jamatia
Posted: Sep 23, 2008 at 0913 hrs IST
New Delhi, September 22 In an unexpected turn of events, Jamia Milia Islamia on Monday evening decided to provide legal help to its two students arrested for alleged connection in Saturday’s serial blasts across the Capital.
Mohammad Shakeel, a second-year MA student, and Zia-Ur-Rehman (third year BA) were arrested on Sunday.
Jamia Vice-Chancellor Mushirul Hasan told Newsline in the evening that he would take steps to look into the “well being” of his students.
Jamia’s media coordinator Rakhshanda Jalil told Newsline, “The university has now decided to provide legal help to the two students caught on Sunday.” Since the two are students of Jamia, “the university feels it is a responsibility to safeguard them until they are proven guilty.”: Sep 23, 2008 at 0913 hrs IST
New Delhi, September 22 In an unexpected turn of events, Jamia Milia Islamia on Monday evening decided to provide legal help to its two students arrested for alleged connection in Saturday’s serial blasts across the Capital.
Mohammad Shakeel, a second-year MA student, and Zia-Ur-Rehman (third year BA) were arrested on Sunday.
Jamia Vice-Chancellor Mushirul Hasan told Newsline in the evening that he would take steps to look into the “well being” of his students.
Jamia’s media coordinator Rakhshanda Jalil told Newsline, “The university has now decided to provide legal help to the two students caught on Sunday.” Since the two are students of Jamia, “the university feels it is a responsibility to safeguard them until they are proven guilty.”
Link
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Ex-Punjab CJ wanted judge moved out in 'interest of justice'
Fri, Sep 12 02:32 AM
"In the interest of justice, he should be transferred," this is what former Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court Justice V K Jain wrote - barely weeks before his retirement on August 1 - to Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan, recommending that Justice Mehtab Singh Gill be moved out.
In his 12-page letter, Justice Jain questioned the judicial propriety of Justice Gill opting to be administrative judge of Ludhiana when he was aware that a property case involving his son, advocate Amandeep Singh Gill, was pending in Ludhiana.Read
"In the interest of justice, he should be transferred," this is what former Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court Justice V K Jain wrote - barely weeks before his retirement on August 1 - to Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan, recommending that Justice Mehtab Singh Gill be moved out.
In his 12-page letter, Justice Jain questioned the judicial propriety of Justice Gill opting to be administrative judge of Ludhiana when he was aware that a property case involving his son, advocate Amandeep Singh Gill, was pending in Ludhiana.Read
Monday, September 8, 2008
Impeachment of Judges
Govt to move impeachment motion against HC judge Sen
9 Sep, 2008, 0344 hrs IST, ET Bureau
NEW DELHI: With Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan recommending removal of Calcutta High Court judge Soumitra Sen on charges of financial misconduct, Union law minister H R Bhardwaj on Monday said the UPA government would soon move an impeachment motion against the judge in Parliament. The CJI had sent his recommendation to the prime minister last month after Justice Sen refused to step down despite being found guilty of misappropriating Rs 32 lakh from the receiver’s account to his personal account. Read more
Failed Impeachment of Justice V Ramaswami in 1993
With 196 votes for, no votes against, and 205 abstentions (by the ruling Congress and allies) in a House with 401 members present and voting, the motion to impeach Justice V Ramaswami of the Supreme Court failed on May 11, 1993. The Constitution requires a motion for the removal of a judge to be carried by a special majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of each House present and voting and an absolute majority of its total membership. Read more
9 Sep, 2008, 0344 hrs IST, ET Bureau
NEW DELHI: With Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan recommending removal of Calcutta High Court judge Soumitra Sen on charges of financial misconduct, Union law minister H R Bhardwaj on Monday said the UPA government would soon move an impeachment motion against the judge in Parliament. The CJI had sent his recommendation to the prime minister last month after Justice Sen refused to step down despite being found guilty of misappropriating Rs 32 lakh from the receiver’s account to his personal account. Read more
Failed Impeachment of Justice V Ramaswami in 1993
With 196 votes for, no votes against, and 205 abstentions (by the ruling Congress and allies) in a House with 401 members present and voting, the motion to impeach Justice V Ramaswami of the Supreme Court failed on May 11, 1993. The Constitution requires a motion for the removal of a judge to be carried by a special majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of each House present and voting and an absolute majority of its total membership. Read more
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)